Supreme Court says leaked abortion draft is authentic; Roberts orders investigation into leak

Pro-abortion and anti-abortion demonstrators protest outside the U.S. Supreme Court docket after the leak of a draft majority opinion written by Justice Samuel Alito getting ready for a majority of the court docket to overturn the landmark Roe v. Wade abortion rights determination later this yr, in Washington, U.S., May 3, 2022. 

Evelyn Hockstein | Reuters

Supreme Courtroom Chief Justice John Roberts on Tuesday confirmed the authenticity of a leaked draft courtroom opinion that would toss out longstanding abortion rights, but noted that isn't the courtroom's ultimate choice.

Roberts ordered an investigation into the leaker.

"To the extent this betrayal of the confidences of the Courtroom was supposed to undermine the integrity of our operations, it will not succeed," the chief justice stated in an announcement. "The work of the Court won't be affected in any means."

"I've directed the Marshal of the Courtroom to launch an investigation into the supply of the leak," Roberts mentioned.

The advance publication of a draft opinion is virtually unprecedented for the excessive court docket, where leaks of any sort are exceedingly uncommon.

The court shares drafts of opinions internally lengthy before they are issued publicly, Roberts noted, calling it "a routine and important part of the Court docket's confidential deliberative work."

The draft on this high-profile abortion case was created in February, in keeping with Politico, which obtained the opinion.

The justices, legislation clerks and different employees of the court docket are "intensely loyal to the establishment and dedicated to the rule of regulation," Roberts said.

"Courtroom staff have an exemplary and important tradition of respecting the confidentiality of the judicial process and upholding the trust of the Courtroom. This was a singular and egregious breach of that trust that's an affront to the Courtroom and the community of public servants who work right here," he said.

The publication of the draft opinion rocked Washington, triggering waves of shock and fury from Democrats who at the moment are pushing for Congress to right away codify abortion rights via laws.

Republicans decried the leak itself, and lots of referred to as for the sort of investigation the Roberts introduced late Tuesday morning. The GOP lawmakers who commented on the draft opinion praised it for putting decisions about abortion within the palms of states instead of the federal authorities.

The 98-page draft opinion was penned by Justice Samuel Alito, certainly one of six conservatives on a court docket that has moved sharply to the correct in the wake of the Trump administration.

Alito's draft would toss out the precedent set by the 1973 case Roe v. Wade and reaffirmed in 1992 by Deliberate Parenthood v. Casey. These pivotal rulings shield the correct to get an abortion earlier than the purpose of fetal viability and require that laws limiting abortion access don't pose an "undue burden."

Alito wrote: "We maintain that Roe and Casey have to be overruled."

The draft of the opinion of the court docket in Dobbs v. Jackson Girls's Well being Group would facet with the state of Mississippi in defense of a regulation that would ban nearly all abortions after 15 weeks of pregnancy.

Lower federal courts had blocked the regulation on the grounds that it violates the protections established by the Roe and Casey selections.

This is breaking information. Please verify back for updates.